🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.